|
132 | Geometric Primitives | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | Native support for mesh-based surface approximations | Closed | |
|
Task Description
There are various scripts around the Net meant for approximating things like isosurfaces and parametric objects using meshes. It would probably run bit faster and be easier to use if this were supported natively within Povray. The feature would require an additional object parameter in order to toggle this behavior on/off.
|
|
131 | Other | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | Ability to change the order of editor tabs by dragging ... | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
See Notepad++ or EditPad Lite for examples.
It would be nice to be able to drag tabs in the editor window to change their order, so as to group opened files together by relevance for instance.
|
|
130 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | High | Master scene unit system variable | Closed | |
|
Task Description
Currently, many POV scenes/include files behave differently depending on the basic units used within the scene. Scaling them differently can affect things like ior and media. A master system variable that users can set to configure the scene’s units would be beneficial for sharing and collaboration purposes, so that person A’s glass interior works correctly in person B’s wine glass scene. Just like the #version system variable, it should have a default value but should be possible to explicitly override.
|
|
129 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Defer | Very Low | Hash arrays | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
Currently, array items may only be referenced by their index number (an integer). It would be nice to also be able to assign string values as array indexes, as in other scripting languages.
|
|
128 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | Mixed-type arrays | Closed | |
|
Task Description
Currently, arrays may contain only one object type. Would be nice to eliminate this restriction and allow arrays to contain objects of different types.
|
|
127 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | Expandable arrays | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
Currently, arrays are of a fixed size. You can’t add or remove items to/from an array. I think it would like arrays to be expandable with no fixed and pre-determined size.
|
|
126 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | Explicit #RETURN statement inside macros | Closed | |
|
Task Description
In POV SDL it can sometimes be ambiguous what exactly a macro returns. An explicit #RETURNS statement would make this unambiguous.
|
|
125 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Very Low | System variable to track whether a file has been includ ... | Closed | |
|
Task Description
Request a system variable to test whether a scene file has been included by another scene file.
For instance:
#if (is_included)
camera {...}
#end
|
|
124 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Defer | Very Low | variable number of parameters in macros | Closed | |
Future release |
Task Description
Many programming languages support an indeterminate number of parameters in functions/macros.
JavaScript for instance supports an “arguments” object.
Lua for instance supports the “args” object.
I would like to see that added to POV as well.
Here’s an JavaScript example:
function ArgTest(a, b){
var i, s = "The ArgTest function expected ";
var numargs = arguments.length; //Get number of arguments passed.
var expargs = ArgTest.length; //Get number of arguments expected.
if (expargs < 2)
s += expargs + " argument. ";
else
s += expargs + " arguments. ";
if (numargs < 2)
s += numargs + " was passed.";
else
s += numargs + " were passed.";
s += "\n\n"
for (i =0 ; i < numargs; i++){ //Get argument contents.
s += " Arg " + i + " = " + arguments[i] + "\n";
}
return(s); //Return list of arguments.
}
|
|
123 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | #BREAK statement inside #WHILE and #FOR loops | Closed | |
|
Task Description
Request #BREAK statement inside #WHILE and #FOR loops.
|
|
122 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | #ELSEIF statement | Closed | |
3.70 beta 38 |
Task Description
Request an #ELSEIF statement in POV SDL.
|
|
121 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | Option to render pixels randomly, or in Nth pixel | Closed | |
|
Task Description
Assuming there are no performance issues, it would be nice to tell Povray to select the pixels to render randomly, so that the image gets filled in gradually instead of from top to bottom and from left to right.
Also, maybe an option to tell it to render every Nth pixel.
|
|
119 | Documentation | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | Table of Contents in each page of the docs | Closed | |
3.70 release |
Task Description
There should be a table of contents on each page of the documentation, or at least on the very long pages. Scrolling through the entire page to figure out what topics are covered sucks.
|
|
118 | Light source | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | More efficient handling of fading lights | Tracked on GitHub | |
3.71 release |
Task Description
Currently, fading light sources are used for lighting and shadow calculations even when so far away as to no longer have any effect on the outcome. The proposed solution is to add a new keyword fade_cutoff_distance which tells povray to ignore the light source when alluminating a point at larger distance.
A sample implementation is provided in the attached files. These changes are still based on beta 34 as sources for the current beta are not yet available, and starting to merge changes to beta 35 only at this time didn’t seem worth the effort. Also, please disregard, changes in the CVS header comments (I also use CVS locally for managing source files).
Further considerations regarding this feature:
- For special effects this feature can also be used if the light source does not actually use fading. On the other hand, cutting the light at some distances can be considered an extreme form of fading which may justify the keyword name anyhow.
- Depending on how FS#46 is implemented, the test for cutoff may then be needed at another location as well.
- The default value currently is 0 (or *no* cutoff distance). For #version 3.7 of higher, the default could be chosen automatically based on the light source intensity and adc_bailout, although it may then need to be overriden by the user for extreme pigments.
|
|
115 | Texture/Material/Finish | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37a | Very Low | Low | More cutaway_textures | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
Think this is still a problem. See the attached scene file. Find the WindowFrameSegment declaration for more info. The scene as-is shows the problem (SOME portions of the difference inherit the color of the room) the window opening is scaled larger to show that they AREN’T touching. The problem goes away when (in WindowFrameSegment) the 1st occurrence of the applied texture is commented out and the 2nd occurrence is uncommented, and cutaway_textures is commented out.
|
|
108 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 37 | Very Low | Low | motion_blur feature similar to Megapov version | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
motion_blur which is a simple and effective feature to use in Megapov to simulate motion blur of, e.g. bird wings, propellers or running animals, would be a neat addition to version 3.7 and later.
In Megapov, the feature requires a line of code in the global_settings{} e.g.: motion_blur 10, 2 and a declaration for the moving object. e.g.:
motion_blur {
type 0
object{MyObject material{MyMaterial rotate x*clock*2}}
rotate x*clock*10
}
type represents several types of pre-defined motions.
Thanks,
Thomas
|
|
101 | Include files | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 36 | Very Low | Low | woodmaps.inc dependency | Closed | |
3.70 beta 38 |
Task Description
woodmaps.inc depends on colors.inc, more specifically the definition of the color “Clear” perhaps a #ifndef colors.inc belongs in woodmaps.inc or probably more correctly changing the call of “Clear” to rgbf 1
|
|
96 | Texture/Material/Finish | Feature Request | Not applicable | Very Low | Low | User-defined warps | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
User-defined warps would be nice to have, something along the lines of:
warp {
function { MyFnX(x,y,z) } // function to compute pattern-space x-coordinate from object-space <x,y,z> coordinate
function { MyFnY(x,y,z) } // ditto for pattern-space y coordinate
function { MyFnZ(x,y,z) } // ditto for pattern-space z coordinate
}
// a displacement warp:
warp {
function { x + MyFnX(x,y,z) }
function { y + MyFnY(x,y,z) }
function { z + MyFnZ(x,y,z) }
}
|
|
91 | Texture/Material/Finish | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 36 | Defer | Low | Slope pattern applied to object is not transformed afte... | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
There is an big issue with the slope pattern: when the object it is applied to is instanced (again) with a transformation (in particular a rotation, as a translation would not impact.. but a shear might), the colours of the surfaces are changed.
object { p translate -5*x }
object { p rotate 220*y+20*x translate 3*x }
Nobody would expect the object to be different in appearance. If slope {} is replaced with wood, all is fine. (as for others textures, i guess)
IMHO, the slope vector need to be adjusted for the later transformation(s) (so as to compensate the issue of using the Perturbed Normal vector).
This should not impact the AOI/FACING (experimental) patterns, as AOI definition is pretty clear about duplicating & transform if you think about it a bit, as well as FACING: for these two, it is expected to either use the ray(current point of view) or a fixed 3D point as reference. At the limit, discussion about moving the 3D point of FACING might also be opened to interpretation.
AOI/FACING are in task #19
|
|
87 | Geometric Primitives | Feature Request | Not applicable | Defer | Very Low | Add new feature: Reference object | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
When you instantiate an object several times, eg:
object { MyObj translate -x*10 }
object { MyObj translate x*10 }
POV-Ray will copy that object in memory, at least for most types of objects. Not for all of them, though. Most famously if MyObj is a mesh, it won’t be copied, but only a reference to the original will be used, thus saving memory. (There are a few other primitives which also don’t cause a copy, such as bicubic_patch and blob, but those are naturally not so popular as mesh, so it’s a less known fact.)
AFAIK the reason why referencing (rather than copying) is not used for all types of objects is rather complicated, and mostly related to how transformations are applied to these objects. For example if the object being instantiated is a union, the translates above will be (AFAIK) applied to the individual members of the union rather than to the union object itself.
Copying, however, can be quite detrimental in some situations. For example if you have a huge union, and you want to instantiate it many times, the memory usage will be that many times larger (compared to just one instance). This is sometimes something which the user would not want, even if it made the rendering slightly slower as a consequence. (In other words, better to be able to render the scene in the first place, rather than running out of memory.)
Redesigning POV-Ray so that all objects would be referenced rather than copied would probably be a huge job, and in some cases a questionable one. There probably are situations where the current method really produces faster rendering times, so redesigning POV-Ray so that it would always reference instead of copy, could make some scenes render slower.
So this got me thinking about an alternative approach: How hard would it be to create a special object which sole purpose is to act as a reference to another object, without copying it? This special reference object would act as any regular object, would have its own transformation matrix and all that data related to objects, but its sole purpose is to simply be a “wrapper” which references an existing object. It could be, for example, like this:
object_ref { MyObj translate -x*10 }
object_ref { MyObj translate x*10 }
The end result would be exactly identical as earlier, but the difference is that now MyObj behaves in the same way as a mesh (in the sense that it’s not instantiated twice, but only once, even though it appears twice in the scene), regardless of what MyObj is.
In some cases this might render slightly slower than the first version (because POV-Ray has to apply the transformations of the object_ref first, after which it applies whatever transformations are inside MyObj), but that’s not the point here. The point is to save memory if MyObj is large.
An object_ref would behave like any other object, so you could do things like:
#declare MyObjRef = object_ref { MyObj };
object { MyObjRef translate -x*10 }
object { MyObjRef translate x*10 }
(The only thing being instantiated (and copied) here is the “MyObjRef” object, not the object it’s referring to, so that actual object is still stored in memory only once.)
In some situations it might even be so that referenced objects actually render faster than if the objects were copied because references increase data locality, lessening cache misses.
I believe this could be a rather useful feature and should be seriously considered, unless there are some major obstacles in implementing it.
|
|
86 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | Not applicable | Defer | Very Low | Add support for more RNG types | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
The current 32-bit linear congruential generator used as RNG in POV-Ray is sometimes quite limited for some purposes and in a few cases its poor quality shows up (as has been demonstrated more than once in the newsgroup). Thus it would be nice if POV-Ray offered additional, higher-quality random number generators, besides the current one (which should probably remain for backwards compatibility). These RNGs could include algorithms like the Mersenne Twister and the ISAAC RNG, both of which have very decent quality and have an enormous periods (while at the same time being very fast).
After a long discussion, the following syntax for specifying the RNG type and seed (which may be larger than 32 bits) has been suggested:
seed(<value>) | seed(<type>, <value> [, <values>])
For example:
#declare Seed1 = seed(123); // Use the current RNG, with seed 123
#declare Seed2 = seed(1, 123); // Identical to the previous one
#declare Seed3 = seed(2, 456, 789, 123); // Use RNG algorithm #2,
// with a large seed (96 bits specified here)
A C++ implementation of the ISAAC RNG can be found at http://warp.povusers.org/IsaacRand.zip
|
|
85 | Other | Feature Request | Not applicable | Defer | Low | Aspect ratio issues | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
Background
When rendering an image, there are actually three aspect ratios involved:
1) The aspect ratio of the camera, set with the up and right vectors.
2) The aspect ratio of the rendered image, set with the +W and +H parameters.
3) The aspect ratio of the pixels in the intended target medium. While this is very often 1:1, it’s definitely not always so (anamorphic images are common in some media, such as DVDs).
The aspect ratio of the camera does not (and arguably should not, although some people might disagree) define the aspect ratio of the image resolution, but the aspect ratio of the image as shown on the final medium. In other words, it defines how the image should be displayed, not what the resolution of the image should be.
This of course means that the aspect ratio of the target medium pixels has to be taken into account when specifying the image resolution. If the target medium pixels are not 1:1 (eg. when rendering for a medium with non-square pixels, or when rendering an anamorphic image eg. for a DVD), the proper resolution has to be specified so that the aspect ratio of the displayed image remains the same as the one specified in the camera block.
This isn’t generally a problem. It usually goes like “my screen is physically 4:3, so I design my scene for that aspect ratio, but the resolution of my screen is mxn which is not 4:3, but that doesn’t matter; I just render with +Wm +Hn and I get a correct image for my screen”.
However, problems start when someone renders an image using an image aspect ratio / pixel aspect ratio combination which does not match the camera aspect ratio. By far the most common situation is rendering a scene with a 4:3 camera for a screen with square pixels but with a non-4:3 resolution (most typically 16:9 or 16:10 nowadays). The image will be horizontally stretched.
In a few cases the effect is the reverse: The scene (and thus the camera) has been designed for some less-typical aspect ratio, eg. a cinematic 2.4:1 aspect ratio, but then someone renders the image with a 4:3 resolution. The resulting image will be horizontally squeezed.
In a few cases this is actually the correct and desired behavior, ie. when you are really rendering the image in an anamorphic format (eg. for a DVD). However, often it’s an inadverted mistake.
Some people argue that this default behavior should be changed. However, there are also good arguments why it should not be changed. Some argue that POV-Ray should have more features (at the SDL level, at the command-line level or both) to control this behavior.
There are several possible situations, which is why this issue is so complicated. These situations may include:
- The scene author doesn’t really care what aspect ratio is used to render the image, even if it means that additional parts of the scenery become visible or parts are cropped away when using a different aspect ratio than what he used.
In this case the choice of camera aspect ratio should be up to the person who renders the image, and thus selectable on the command-line. However, he should have an easy choice of how changing the aspect ratio affects the image: Should it extend the viewing range, or should it crop part of it, compared to the original?
And this, of course, while still making it possible to render for an anamorphic format.
- The author wants to support different aspect ratios, but he wants to control precisely how it affects the composition of the image. Maybe he never wants anything cropped away within certain limits, but instead the image should always be extended in whichever direction is necessary due to the aspect ratio. Or maybe he wants to allow cropping the image, but only up to a certain point. Or whatever.
In this case the choice of camera aspect ratio should be up to the author, and thus selectable in the scene file, while still allowing some changes from the command-line.
- The author designed his scene for a precise aspect ratio and nothing else, and doesn’t want the image to be rendered in any other aspect ratio. Maybe he used some very peculiar aspect ratio (eg. something like 1:2, ie. twice as tall as wide) for artistic composition reasons, and wants the image rendered with that aspect ratio, period.
Perhaps the author should be able to completely forbid the change of camera aspect ratio in the command-line.
Of course anamorphic rendering should still be supported for targets with a different pixel aspect ratio.
Possible solution
This solution does not necessarily address all the problems described above perfectly, but could be a good starting point for more ideas:
Add a way to specify in the camera block minimum and maximum limits for the horizontal and vertical viewing angles (and if any of them is unspecified, it’s unlimited). Of course for this to be useful in any way, there should also be a way to change the camera and pixel aspect ratios from the command line.
The idea with this is that the author of the scene can use these angle limits to define a rectangular “protected zone” at the center of the view, using the minimum angle limits. In other words, no matter how the camera aspect ratio is modified, the horizontal and/or vertical viewing angles will never get smaller than these minimum angles. This ensures that the image will never be cropped beyond a certain limit, only extended either horizontally or vertically to ensure that the “protected zone” always remains fully visible regardless of what aspect ratio is used.
The maximum angles can be used for the reverse: They ensure that no scenery beyond a certain point will ever become visible, no matter what aspect ratio is used. This can be used to make sure that unmodelled parts of the scene never come into view. Thus the image will always be cropped to ensure this, depending on the aspect ratio.
I’m not completely sure what should be done if both minimum and maximum angles are specified, and the user specifies an aspect ratio which would break these limits. An error message could be a possibility. At least it would be a way for the author to make sure his scene is never rendered using an aspect ratio he doesn’t want. He can use these angle limits to give some leeway how much the aspect ratio can change, to an extent, or he could even force a specific aspect ratio and nothing else (by specifying that both the minimum and maximum angles are the same).
So in short:
- Add a “minimum/maximum horizontal/vertical angles” feature to the camera block. These can be used to define a “protected zone” in the image which must not be breached by command-line options.
- Add a command-line syntax to change the camera aspect ratio (which automatically obeys the “protected zone” settings). Could perhaps give an error message if the command-line options break the limits in the scene camera.
- Add a command-line syntax to specify a pixel aspect ratio other than 1:1. This can be used to render anamorphic versions of the image on purpose (iow. not by mistake).
This can probably be made backwards-compatible in that if none of these new features are used, the behavior could be the same as currently (or at least similar).
|
|
84 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | Not applicable | Defer | Very Low | A for-loop construct | Closed | |
3.70 beta 37 |
Task Description
Many people clearly miss a simple for-loop construct in povray. It is indeed true that probably at least 99% of #while loops out there have the form of a simple for-loop. It’s much rarer to have to use more exotic forms of looping supported by the #while mechanism. Thus it would make sense if a #for construct would be added which would make writing such loops much easier and convenient.
The only remaining question would be the syntax.
IMO the for-loop construct should implicitly declare a local variable of a specified name, automatically increment it during the loop, and then undefine it after the loop ends. It could perhaps be something along the lines of:
#for(<identifier name>, <initial value>, <final value> [, <step>])
<loop body>
#end
Example:
#for(Counter, 1, 10) // 'Counter' gets values 1, 2, 3, ..., 10
#debug concat(str(Counter, 0, 0), "\n")
#end
#for(Counter, 1, 10, 3) // 'Counter' gets values 1, 4, 7, 10
#debug concat(str(Counter, 0, 0), "\n")
#end
I think this syntax ought to be relatively easy to implement (compared to more “traditional” syntaxes, such as something like “for Counter = 1 to 10” or the C syntax, which would be a lot more complicated).
Of course this raises a couple of questions:
1) What happens if ‘Counter’ was already declared as an identifier? One of three possibilities comes to mind:
2) Should the user be able to modify the counter variable from inside the body of the loop? Something like this comes to mind as viable:
// Prints the values 1, 2, 3, 9 and 10
#for(Counter, 1, 10)
#debug concat(str(Counter, 0, 0), "\n")
#if(Counter = 3) #local Counter = 8; #end
#end
Alternatively the counter variable could be read-only.
Additionally, it could be nice if #break could be used to immediately jump out of the current loop (either #while or #for).
|
|
79 | Source code | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 35a | Very Low | Low | Full-Featured Test-Scene to check the correctness of po... | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
Hi,
it would be nice if there exists a test scene (not a benchmark) which has a high coverage of povray source and can be used as correctness validation of povray. It schould be produce an image which can be compared to a golden reference image.
It may be also possible to create a regression test suite which does automatic comparision of the render results.
|
|
76 | Other | Feature Request | 3.6 | Very Low | Medium | Povray returns incorrect exit code when aborting render | Closed | |
3.70 release |
Task Description
If you abort a render with ^C, Povray exits with a ‘success’ error code.
To test:
povray scene.ini
(^C to abort it)
echo $?
Right now 0 is returned (’success’). A non-zero value should be returned (’failure’).
This is particularly important for scripting, where command lines like:
povray scene.ini && halt
...can be used. I only want the halt to be executed if the scene renders successfully. If I change my mind and ^C it, I don’t want the machine to shut down!
|
|
66 | Texture/Material/Finish | Feature Request | 3.62 | Defer | Low | checker and cells pattern are slightly off-center | Closed | |
|
Task Description
In POV-Ray 3.6 (including 3.62), checker and cells patterns are off by 0.001 (1e-3) units, as can be demonstrated with this scene:
camera {
location <0.0, 0.0, -5.0>
direction 1.5*z
right x*image_width/image_height
look_at <0.0, 0.0, 0.0>
}
box { <-1,-1,0>, <0,0,1> pigment { checker color rgb 1 color rgb 0 scale 0.2 translate <-0.5,-0.5,0> } finish { ambient 1 diffuse 0 } }
box { < 1, 1,0>, <0,0,1> pigment { checker color rgb 1 color rgb 0 scale 0.2 translate < 0.5, 0.5,0> } finish { ambient 1 diffuse 0 } }
box { < 1,-1,0>, <0,0,1> pigment { checker color rgb 1 color rgb 0 scale 200.0 translate < 0.5,-0.5,0> } finish { ambient 1 diffuse 0 } }
box { <-1, 1,0>, <0,0,1> pigment { checker color rgb 1 color rgb 0 scale 200.0 translate <-0.5, 0.5,0> } finish { ambient 1 diffuse 0 } }
The same can be demonstrated for the cells pattern.
POV-Ray 3.7 beta 34 is “clean”.
|
|
65 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 34 | Very Low | Low | Add support for vectors with functions | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
Being able to have functions operate on vectors would be pretty nice to have.
|
|
64 | Image format | Feature Request | Not applicable | Very Low | Low | Add "POV-Ray" metatags to images | Closed | |
3.70 beta 41 |
Task Description
Add metatags to output images identifying the file as having been created using POV-Ray.
|
|
63 | Geometric Primitives | Feature Request | Not applicable | Very Low | Low | Extend native support for 2D primitives | Closed | |
|
Task Description
Improve native support for 2D primitives. Ideally a 1:1 mapping of SVG primitives/shapes. They go a long way to making diagrams look a lot better. Having to create image maps based on externally created bitmaps slows the workflow down a lot!
|
|
62 | Geometric Primitives | Feature Request | Not applicable | Very Low | Low | Set and get font metrics | Closed | |
|
Task Description
Add a way to get and set font metrics.
Attached an image that shows what I’m talking about.
Thanks!!
|
|
44 | Radiosity | Feature Request | All | Very Low | Low | Improve Normals Handling in Radiosity | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
Currently, radiosity does not make use of the fact that pertubed normals would theoretically just require a different weighting of already-sampled rays, leading to the following issues:
Honoring normal pertubations in radiosity leads to an increased number of samples, slowing down sample cache lookup.
The increased number of samples is generated from a proportionally higher number of sample rays, slowing down pretrace even further.
Low-amplitude pertubations tend to be smoothed out; “reviving” these is only possible by increasing the general sample density.
Handling of multi-layered textures with different normal pertubations is currently poorly implemented.
As a solution, I propose to store for each radiosity sample not only the resulting illumination for a perfectly unpertubed normal, but from the same set of sample rays also compute the illumination for an additional set of about a dozen standardized pertubed-normal directions, and interpolate among these when computing the radiosity-based illumination for a particular point that has a pertubed normal.
For backwards compatibility, this method of dealing with pertubed normals in radiosity might be activated by a different value for the “normal” statement in the radiosity block, say, “normal 2”.
|
|
41 | Other | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 32 | Very Low | Low | improve command-line parsing error messages | Tracked on GitHub | |
|
Task Description
POV-Ray 3.6, upon encountering problems when parsing command line and/or .ini file options, would quote the offending option in the error message.
POV-Ray 3.7 currently just reports that there is some problem with the command line, without providing any details. I suggest changing this, as the information may be helpful at times.
|
|
35 | Documentation | Feature Request | All | Very Low | Low | problem parsing +i option in povray-3.7.0.beta.32 on li ... | Closed | |
|
Task Description
The commands:
povray +i /home/ronis/Nm=500/povray.00001.pov
or
povray +i/home/ronis/Nm=500/povray.00001.pov
fail with: povray: this pre-release version of POV-Ray for Unix expires in 2 day(s) and 1 hour(s) Failed to parse command-line option
Going to the directory and simply running: povray +i povray.00001.pov works.
I came across this by accident trying to get emac’s povray mode to work; apparently it passes the full path name to povray.
I don’t think there is a problem in 3.6.1
|
|
30 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | Not applicable | Defer | Very Low | Custom progress information during parsing | Closed | |
|
Task Description
For some particularly “heavy” SDL scripts, it might be desirable to override (or complement) the standard “Parsing 47110815K tokens” progress information with some more helpful custom info, e.g. “Planting trees... (37%)”, or “Generating terrain mesh row 47 of 500”.
|
|
28 | Frontend | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 32 | Very Low | Low | #debug message not displayed. | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
The #debug message stream is only being flushed when it hits a newline character, instead of after each #debug statement. This means that some final strings don’t show up.
#debug "This line prints,\n but this line doesn't."
|
|
27 | Other | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 32 | Very Low | Low | Add texture support to background statement | Tracked on GitHub | |
Future release |
Task Description
Adding full texture statement support to the background statement (with a scale of 1/1) aligned with the image_map direction of an image would allow i.e. specifying an image as background easily.
|
|
20 | User interface | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 32 | Very Low | Very Low | render window behavior | Tracked on GitHub | |
|
Task Description
When changing the behavior of the render window, “Keep above main”, requires restarting the POV editor to take effect. It would be nice either to get a warning to restart, or to get it to work without restarting.
|
|
19 | Texture/Material/Finish | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 32 | Very Low | Low | AOI pattern | Closed | |
3.70 beta 37 |
Task Description
Adding an AOI pattern is asked for fairly frequently.
|
|
10 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 32 | Very Low | Medium | Add support for specifying input images' gamma pre-corr ... | Closed | |
3.70 beta 40 |
Task Description
Input image files may have been created with gamma pre-correction for some specific target gamma, which may vary from image to image. Some file formats like PNG or HDR support embedding gamma pre-correction information in the image file, but this information may be missing or faulty, and some formats don’t support it at all. Additionally, it may be desirable to tamper with an input image’s gamma for artistic reasons.
Therefore, I suggest adding a means to explicitly specify input images’ originally intended target gamma on a per-image basis, like:
image_map { jpeg "MyImage.jpg" assumed_gamma 1.8 }
|
|
9 | Parser/SDL | Feature Request | 3.70 beta 32 | Very Low | Low | Add support for tuning brightness of image-mapped sky s ... | Closed | |
3.70 RC4 |
Task Description
Adjusting the brightness of an image-mapped sky sphere, although not an uncommon task especially when using HDR light probes, currently is cumbersome at best, as it is not possible to specify a “finish { ambient ... }” statement.
To simplify tuning a sky sphere’s brightness, I suggest introducing a “brightness FLOAT” modifier (defaulting to 1.0) to either the sky_sphere block or (as a more versatile solution) the image_map statement.
|